Legal Opinion

Olesen v. Town (City) of Hurley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 2004No. NonePublished

1Opinion of the Court

691 N.W.2d 324 (2004)

2004 SD 136

Burnell OLESEN and Mary E. Olesen, Plaintiffs and Appellees,

v.

TOWN (City) OF HURLEY, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 22934.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Considered on Briefs June 1, 2004.

Decided December 29, 2004.

Samuel M. Goodhope of Moore, Rasmussen, Kading, and Kunstle, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, Attorneys for plaintiffs and appellees.

Timothy W. Bjorkman of Bjorkman & Fink, Bridgewater, South Dakota, Attorneys for defendant and appellant.

ECKRICH, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] City of Hurley (City) appeals 1) the trial court's determination that it was not entitled to…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. City of Clinton v. Cedar Rapids & Missouri River RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Oien v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ericksen v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. L.R. Foy Construction Co. v. South Dakota State Cement Plant CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Merriam v. Moody's ExecutorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API