Legal Opinion

Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 21, 2001No. 00-287PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAmestoy, C.J.

Defendant North River Insurance Company appeals a Washington Superior Court order granting plaintiffs, Agency of Natural Resources’, motion for summary judgment.1 *304Defendant contends that the court erred in ordering North River to pay restitution to the State for costs incurred in the investigation and clean-up of an underground petroleum leak. Defendant raises four arguments on appeal: (1) the State does not have a legal cause of action under 10 V.S.A. § 1941(f) and therefore does not have standing; (2) the relevant provision of the North River insurance policy specifically excludes insurance…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Wesco, Inc. v. SorrellSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. Housing Authority Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Chicago Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Kirk Wool v. Office of Professional RegulationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. Hardwick Recycling & Salvage, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  5. R&G Properties, Inc. v. Column Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API