Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Haywood v. Earl

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1893No. 15,714PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This was an action to recover a penalty, under section 6339, R. S. 1881. Appellant filed interrogatories with his complaint, which, on motion of the appellee, were struck out.

Appellee filed a demurrer to the complaint, which was overruled and exceptions reserved, and the appellee then filed a motion to make the complaint more specific, which motion was sustained in part and overruled in part, and *390the record shows that the appellant amended his complaint,, in accordance with the ruling and order of court, hut the' amended complaint is not in the record. The record shows-that a demurrer was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Berghoff v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. McCardle v. McGinleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Collins v. United States Express Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Kennedy v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Heizer v. KellyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barnes v. PelhamIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Davis v. TalbotIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State ex rel. Haywood v. EarlIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API