Legal Opinion

Applewhite v. Bivens

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 9, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2009-0766Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARC E. APPLEWHITE, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 09-0766 (RMU) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 22, 24 : SHAMEKA BIVENS et al., : : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE THE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. The pro se plaintiff, an incarcerated inmate, commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that prison officials…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API