Legal Opinion

Medrano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 2008No. B202828PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

INTRODUCTION

Both the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) and the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) determined that Carlos Medrano (Medrano), who suffered an industrial injury, was entitled to vocational rehabilitation services, including continuing payment of vocational rehabilitation maintenance allowance (VRMA), retroactive to the last temporary disability payment. The Board determined, however, that State Compensation Insurance Fund (State Fund), the employer’s insurer, was allowed a credit against VRMA for wages Medrano earned at employment subsequent to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. BirtwhistleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Webb v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Ritchie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Edgar v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Beverly Hilton Hotel v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Los Angeles County Fire Department v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API