Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. Hagley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1930No. 19147 Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff in error, the city of Chicago, filed its complaint in the municipal court of Chicago charging defendant in error, Olive L. Hagley, with operating an ice cream parlor without a license, as required by the ordinances of the city. A jury was waived, there was a trial by the court, defendant in error was found guilty and a fine of $25 was assessed. Defendant in error appealed to this court, the trial court having certified that the validity of an ordinance was involved. The case was transferred to the Appellate Court for the First District, where the judgment was reversed, and the case…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Armstrong Paint & Varnish Works v. Continental Can Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Hadley v. Union Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. CourtneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Jambrone v. DavidIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Jambrone v. DavidIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API