Legal Opinion

Hadley v. Union Trust & Savings Bank

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1923No. 15093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

In an action of assumpsit on the common counts for service's as an attorney and for costs advanced, W. E. Hadley recovered a judgment in the city court of East St. Louis against the Union Trust and Savings Bank for $2510. Upon appeal by the defendant the Appellate Court for the Eourth District reversed this judgment, and, making a finding of facts, rendered judgment against the defendant for $10, costs advanced and admitted to be due the plaintiff. On the petition of the plaintiff a writ of certiorari was issued, and the record has been returned to this court.

The question involved is wholly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Foster v. GrafIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Navratel v. Curtis Door & Sash Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Shaw v. CourtneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1944
  2. City of Chicago v. HagleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API