Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Columbus
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 28, 1996No. C2-94-1267PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Pamela Y. Miller, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 asserting that the defendants, City of Columbus, Ohio (hereinafter referred to as “City”) and Thomas E. Miller and Jeffrey Mathys, Columbus Police officers, violated her rights under the Fourth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. Plaintiff also asserts state law claims of negligence and intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiff brings this suit against defendants in their official and individual capacities. This…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hunt v. City of Toledo Law DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2012
- Waters v. DrakeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
- Watkins v. Millennium SchoolDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Barrett v. Outlet Broadcasting, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1997
- Gardner v. VILLAGE OF GRAND RIVER, OHDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.