Legal Opinion

Grundman v. Town of Brighton

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1956PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrederic T. Henry, J.

This is an action to enjoin the individual defendants, as officers of the defendant town, from enforcing the provisions of subdivision 4 of section 33 of article VI of the Zoning Ordinance of said town, which ordinance prohibits the location of places selling alcoholic beverages for on-premises consumption within one-half mile of a school and within 1,000 feet of any public playground, hospital, church, synagogue or children’s home.

The defendant, New York State Liquor Authority, upon its motion, was permitted to intervene as a necessary party, under section 124 of the Alcoholic Beverage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barry v. O'ConnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. Department of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
  4. Jewish Consumptives' Relief Society v. Town of WoodburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Golden v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Town of Onondaga v. HubbellNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  2. TJPC Restaurant Corp. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Town of Fenton v. TedinoNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API