Legal Opinion
County of Rice v. Lacroix
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 22, 1928No. 26,628PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.
Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
In September, 1920, appellants filed in the office of the county auditor of Rice, county a petition for a public ditch to be known as county ditch No. 18. The petition, among other things, contained this provision:
“The undersigned agree to pay to said Qounty all costs and expenses which may be incurred in case these proceedings are dismissed or for any reason no contract for the construction of said proposed County Ditch is let.”
This action is to recover for costs and expenses incurred and paid by the county in the ditch proceedings, the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. County of Murray v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State ex rel. Kohler Contracting Co. v. HansenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Gove v. County of MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- State ex rel. Devine v. PeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
- Kalman v. County of GrantSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Laue v. County of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In Re Judicial Ditch No. 7, Martin & Faribault CountiesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- In re Judicial Ditch No. 24District Court, D. Minnesota · 1949
- Suhr v. County of DodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- County of Cottonwood v. EichnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930