Legal Opinion

People v. White

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 14, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s sole contention on appeal is that his conviction of two counts of sodomy in the third degree is not supported by legally sufficient evidence that defendant was "twenty-one years old or more” (Penal Law § 130.40 [2]) when he engaged in deviate sexual intercourse with his 16-year-old daughter. We disagree. Contrary to defendant’s claim, the trial court properly admitted the testimony regarding his age given by his two teen-age daughters (see, People v Patterson, 149 AD2d 966; Richardson, Evidence, §§ 361, 364 et seq. [Prince 10th ed]; 58…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. RodriquezNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. People v. VaccarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. PattersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API