Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 29, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The respondent, appearing specially, has excepted to the libel on the ground that the suit is time barred, not having been commenced within two years after the alleged cause of action arose as required by the Public Vessels Act.1 The libellant cross-moved for summary judgment.

The libellant was the insurance carrier which had covered the employees of Salvage Process Corporation under a policy issued pursuant to the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C.A. § 901 et seq. The libel alleges that: on September 8, 1951 one Olaf Ellingsen, an employee…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. McMahon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Western Fuel Co. v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Lindgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  5. Osbourne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hidick v. Orion Shipping and Trading Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as Partial Assignee and Subrogee of Alfonse Marchica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  3. United New York Sandy Hook Pilots' Ass'n v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, as Partial Assignee and Subrogee of Alfonse Marchica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API