Legal Opinion

Liberty Mutual Insurance v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 17, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEINFELD, District Judge.

The defendant, appearing specially, moves to dismiss the complaint on the grounds that: (1) the suit is cognizable only in admiralty; (2) the suit is time barred; and (3) the suit is for a penalty not recoverable against the Government since it has not waived sovereign immunity with respect to suits for penalties.

The complaint alleges that: the plaintiff was the workmen’s compensation insurance carrier for the Imparato Stevedoring Corporation; on March 16, 1952, one Leo Migliori, an employee of Imparato, was fatally injured in the course of his employment on Pier 13…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. George Colon & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. Phoenix Indemnity Co. v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API