Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Pollard

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 19, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Case, J.

This is an appeal by the complainant from a final decree in Chancery dismissing the bill as to all of the partners formerly of the law firm of Riker & Riker except Thomas E. Fitzsimmons against whom the decree ran as a judgment in the amount of $20,500 with interest and costs. The suit was to charge all of the members of the firm with liability for what was, in effect, an embezzlement of complainant’s funds by the defendant Fitzsimmons in the above named’ amount.

The appeal presents two main questions, one of fact and the other a mixed question…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Cook v. Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & ChurchillTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Folly Farms I, Inc. v. Trustees of the Clients' Security Trust Fund of the BarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Federal Saving & Loan Insurance v. McGinnis, Juban, Bevan, Mullins & Patterson, P.C.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API