Legal Opinion

Rae v. Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Ass'n

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Does the deliberative process privilege preclude the depositions of non-party administrative agency workers about an agency investigation? The proposed deponents, Monty J. Batson, Esq., Shawn E. Smith, Esq., and Larry Hall (collectively Appellants), pose this and other questions in their appeal from an order of the Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) denying their motion to quash deposition subpoenas. The current issues arise during the discovery phase of spirited tort litigation initiated by an insurance agency and its owner against the Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ben v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Fonner v. Shandon, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. LaValle v. OFFICE OF GEN. COUNSEL OF COM.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Sweeney v. BondCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  5. COM. EX REL. UNIFIED JUD. SYS. v. VartanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rae v. Pennsylvania Funeral Directors Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Com. v. Rodland, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. In the Matter of: Keegan, N. Appeal of: GallagherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Rae v. PA FUNERAL DIRECTORS ASS'NSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Shane Langston v. Freese & Goss, PLLC, Richard A. Freese, Tim K. Goss, Sheila M. Bossier, Dennis C. Sweet, and Sweet & Freese, PLLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API