H.O. Realty Corp. v. State of New York Division of Housing
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Sweeny, J. (dissenting).
Because the majority now departs from long-standing precedent concerning the four-year statute of limitations in residential rent overcharge actions, I must respectfully dissent.
“In reviewing an administrative agency determination, we must ascertain whether there is a rational basis for the action in question or whether it is arbitrary and capricious” (Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 99 NY2d 144, 149 [2002]). Neither the Division of Housing and Community Renewal’s nor the IAS court’s finding of willfulness was arbitrary and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Greystone Mgmt. Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals Bd. of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Zafra v. PilkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Greystone Management Corp. v. Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Tockwotten Associates v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.