Legal Opinion
Wayne-Juntunen Fertilizer Co. v. Lassonde
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided August 16, 1991No. Civ. 900414PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVINE, Justice.
Wayne-Juntunen Fertilizer Company (Wayne-Juntunen) appeals from summary judgment dismissing as untimely its action against Fred Lassonde. We affirm.
This appeal follows our remand of the case in Wayne-Juntunen Fertilizer Co. v. Lassonde, 456 N.W.2d 519 (N.D.1990) (Wayne-Juntunen I). A full statement of the facts is available in that opinion. In Wayne-Juntunen I, we reversed summary judgment dismissing Wayne-Juntunen’s amended complaint. The amended complaint attempted to add Fred Lassonde as a defendant after the expiration of the statute of limitations. See NDCC § 28-01-16.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Francisco Hernandez Jimenez v. Astol Calero ToledoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Kilkenny v. Arco Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Warren L. Anderson and Ruby Anderson v. Deere & Co., John Deere Co., and John Deere Industrial Equipment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Miller Enterprises, Inc. v. Dog N' Cat Pet Centers of America, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Norton v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Moon v. MoonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Rueckert v. RueckertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993