Legal Opinion

State v. Luckett

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 28, 1994No. 15013-1-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Petrich, J. *

— Fernandez Luckett appeals his conviction and sentence for first degree murder. He challenges the trial court’s denial of his motion for a mistrial. His argument is twofold. He claims that the introduction of his then unavailable accomplice’s hearsay statement implicating him in the murder violated his right to confront his accomplice. Next he claims that when the accomplice later in the trial became available and testified, the previously admitted hearsay statement unfairly enhanced the accomplice’s testimony. Luckett also challenges his sentence, claiming it is based on an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. WeberWashington Supreme Court · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. MorleyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  3. State v. MutchCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. State v. MorleyWashington Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API