Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Newburg Chiropractic, P.S.C.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 21, 2010No. 5:06-mj-00281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. SIMPSON III, District Judge.

This case involves an insurer (State Farm) seeking to recoup monies paid to several chiropractic offices on the ground that their practices were unlicensed at the time of the payments, and that State Farm never would have paid the claims had it known this fact. The defendants (Newburg Chiropractic, P.S.C.; Cane Run Chiropractic, P.S.C.; and their principal, Michael Plambeck, D.C.) have moved for partial summary judgment, and State Farm has done likewise with respect to one of its claims against Plambeck.

I

The pertinent facts here are not…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martello v. SantanaDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API