Legal Opinion

Rita Lindsey v. Dillard's, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2002No. 02-1455PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAY, Circuit Judge.

I

The substantive facts of this case are not in dispute on appeal. The Plaintiff, Rita Lindsey, worked for Dillard’s, Inc. (Dillard’s) as a cosmetics associate. Lindsey alleges that while working for Dillard’s she was sexually harassed by a male homosexual co-worker who made comments about men and male homosexual activity. The co-worker did not make any comments about Lindsey or about women in general.

Shortly after filing a charge of discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, Lindsey was injured on the job.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Transit Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters At Lloyd's Of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Green v. Ameritrade, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Michael S. Dahl David Scott Huber v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  2. Duane Carlson v. Arrowhead Concrete Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. ESTEBAN MONTAÑO v. CITY OF CHICAGOCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. City of St. Louis v. Bindan Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2013
  5. Porter v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API