Legal Opinion

Peachey v. Board of Supervisors

California Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8,032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for a writ of mandamus. A petition for hearing in bank was filed in this case after judgment and denied.

1Opinion of the Court

Morrison, C. J.:

Application for a writ of mandamus to compel the defendants, Supervisors of the county of Calaveras, to fix relator’s salary, and to allow his claim for services rendered by him as Superintendent of Schools, in and for the county of Calaveras.

There is but one question in the case, and that is the following: Is Section 1552 of the Political Code applicable to the Superintendent of Schools of Calaveras county? If it is, it- is conceded that a peremptory writ of mandamus should issue in the case.

It is claimed, however, that Section 1552 of the Political Code does not apply to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stortroen v. LincolnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  2. County of Los Angeles v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. People ex rel. Orr v. WhitingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API