Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Smart

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 9, 1908No. 15,823PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus.

1Per curiam

In an action brought by Mary Alice Hamilton against the city of Ottawa she moved for a change of venue, upon the ground that the district judge was disqualified by reason of being a resident and taxpayer of the city. The motion was denied, and thereupon the plaintiff applied to this court for a writ of mandamus to compel that court to grant a change of venue. She insists that the district court committed error in denying her application for a change of venue. It is plausibly argued by counsel for defendant that ownership of property and residence within a city do not constitute such an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mason v. GrubelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Winfrey v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State Ex Rel. Walls v. State Board of Land Com'rsWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Weaver v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
  4. Spacek v. AubertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API