Mathews v. Caldwell
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtStayton, J.
The controversy in this case arises mainly over the construction a written contract of sale of oil, gas, and minerals in and under land. The controlling vendor sued for liquidated damages. It was held in the courts below that he could not recover because he was himself in default. The wording of the contract is important in the consideration of all of the questions • that arise, and especially those requiring inquiry as to whether the abstract that was furnished was sufficient, if legally good as against objections “pointed out,” though defective otherwise in both form and substance; whether,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Eakin v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Evitts v. RothTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Collier v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1895
- Lieber v. NicholsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Glass v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Bashford v. West Miami Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Lambert v. Taylor Telephone Co-Operative, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Zucht v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. BosworthTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.