Legal Opinion

Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Bosworth

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1925No. Motion No. 6602PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHORT, * J.

The motion for rehearing is very able.

It is contended that the ruling upon the allowance of the trial amendment is too strict as to practice. However that may be, the decision of a trial court in permitting the filing of a trial amendment to the plead*171ings before tbe case goes to tbe jury is discretionary, and will not be reviewed, in tbe absence of an abnse of discretion. No sucb abuse is shown in tbis case. Tbe fact that tbe objection against tbe amendment was accompanied by a statement that it would necessitate a continuance could not show that a continuance was necessary. None…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Washington Gas Light Co. v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Cameron Mill & Elevator Co. v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1855
  5. Weems & Waldo v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  2. Satterwhite v. StolzNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Loyd v. HerringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Texas Electric Service Co. v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. RoesslerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API