Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hogan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 15, 2006No. D-2003-610Published

1DissentChapel, Judge

¶ 1 I dissent from today’s opinion because I disagree with the majority’s resolution of Propositions I, V, VI, and VIII of Hogan’s appeal.1

¶2 Hogan admitted that he killed Lisa Stanley. His defense to the first-degree murder charge against him was that he killed her in a “heat of passion,”, which constituted first-degree manslaughter rather than malice-aforethought murder. In Proposition I, Hogan claims that his jury should have been instructed on his theory of defense, ie., that the killing was heat-of-passion manslaughter, and that the State was required to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API