Legal Opinion

Miller v. . Bumgarner

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.

This was an action on a note for $350.00, due 25 August, 1926, executed by defendant Bumgarner, and endorsed by defendants Colvard and Eaw.

Defendant Bumgarner filed no answer, but tbe endorsers set up tbe defense of release by extension of tbe time for payment, and pleaded tbe statute of limitations.

Tbe note contained these words: “Protest, presentment, notice of dishonor, extension of time of payment waived by all parties to tbis note.” On tbe back of tbe note appear tbe signatures of tbe appealing defendants and tbe following credits: “May 25, 1927, int. paid, $15.00; Nov. 29, 1927,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houser v. . FayssouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Town of Franklin v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Corporation Commission v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Revell v. Thrash.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  5. Wrenn v. Lawrence Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Luther v. . LemonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API