Legal Opinion

Luther v. . Lemons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

The evidence for the plaintiffs at the trial of these actions tended to show that the maturity of each of the notes sued on was extended from year to year, by the plaintiff in each action, as the holder of said note, at the request of the defendant J. W. Lemons, the maker, and therefore the principal debtor on each note, to 24 January, 1932. By reason of such extensions, the cause of action on each note did not accrue until 24 January, 1932. Both actions were begun on 31 October, 1934. Neither action is therefore barred by the three-year statute of limitations as against the defendant W. G.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Houser v. . FayssouxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Town of Franklin v. FranksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Revell v. Thrash.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Fidelity Bank v. HesseeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Howell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. EXXON CHEM. AMERICAS, DIV. OF EXXON v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API