Legal Opinion

Cooley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 8, 1997No. 95-02118PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

Timothy Cooley appeals the order of restitution imposed following his conviction for battery. We reverse because the trial court failed to make a determination that the battery caused the injury which was the basis for the order of restitution.

The state charged Cooley with Count (1) aggravated battery on William C. Geiler, and Count (2) battery on William C. Geiler. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on Count (1) and guilty on Count (2). The trial court entered an order of restitution requiring Cooley to pay $8,814.27 for medical and related expenses, plus $5948 for loss…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. Barkley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. In the Interest of F.J.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Acosta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Heck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. State of Florida v. Mary Gayle TomasheskiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Harvis v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
  5. Perez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API