State of Florida v. Mary Gayle Tomasheski
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The State, appeals a restitution order. It argues the court erred in limiting restitution to $20,001. We agree and reverse.
The State charged the defendant with grand theft from persons sixty-five years of age or older and an organized scheme to defraud more than $50,000. The State alleged that the defendant, the victims’ caregiver, knowingly obtained $50,000 or more from them. The verdict form allowed the jury to determine the monetary value range for the grand theft and organized scheme to defraud counts; five value ranges were provided.
The jury found the defendant guilty of grand theft of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Koile v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Bernhard Dohrmann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- J.O.S. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
- Acosta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Allen Christopher Jones v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026
- ROSA ELENA MARTINEZ v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021