Legal Opinion

Nance v. Nance

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1887PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Talladega Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. S. K. McSpadden. The appellants, J. W. Nance, et el., filed this bill against William and Mary Nance, on the ground and for the reasons set out in the opinion. At final hearing, on pleadings and proof, the bill was dismissed out of court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlopton, J.

The defendants were married in February, 1867. Prior to the solemnization of-tlie marriage, an agreement was entered into between them, by which W. H. Nance agreed, in consideration of the marriage, to settle on the intended wife by good and sufficient conveyances, to be executed on or before the first day of January thereafter, certain specified real estate situate in the town of Talladega. The conveyances were executed as provided by the agreement. Appellants, who are judgment creditors of Nance, and who were creditors at the time of the execution of the agreement and of the marriage, seek…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Prewit v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Fellows v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Hoot v. SorrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  4. Alley v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  5. Lockwood v. NelsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ware v. Hamilton Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Manchuria S. S. Co. v. Harry G. G. Donald & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Jackson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  4. Majors v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Sneed v. DavisSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API