Legal Opinion

Lowenberg v. Greenebaum

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1893No. 14431PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Judgment went in the court below for plaintiff; and defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.

In January, 1888, Simon Kullman et al. recovered a money judgment for several thousand dollars against the defendant in the present action, Jacob Greenebaum; and on September 23, 1889, an ordinary writ of execution was issued on said judgment. The sheriff undertook, under said writ, to levy upon and sell as personal property the “seat” of said Greenebaum in an association known as the San Francisco Stock and Exchange Board. He endeavored to accomplish this in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jardine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Spotswood v. MorrisIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  3. City & County of San Francisco v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mayor of Baltimore v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903
  5. W. G. Press & Co. v. FahyIllinois Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API