Legal Opinion

Santana v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 28, 2026No. 19/25Published

1Opinion of the Court

Miguel Angel Santana v. State of Maryland, No. 19, September Term, 2025. Opinion by Eaves, J. CRIMINAL LAW – MISTRIAL – PROHIBITION ON DOUBLE JEOPARDY – NO RECKLESS STATE ACTION The Supreme Court of Maryland assumed—without deciding—that Maryland’s common law prohibition on double jeopardy bars a subsequent prosecution where the State’s reckless action caused a criminal defendant to successfully move for a mistrial. With that assumption, the Court held that the circuit court’s finding that the State did not engage in reckless conduct was not clearly erroneous. Therefore, the Court affirmed…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API