Legal Opinion

Roseburg Forest Products v. McDonald

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1992No. 90-01111; CA A69668PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Employer seeks review of an order by the Workers’ Compensation Board awarding claimant penalties and attorney fees for employer’s failure to pay time loss benefits pursuant to a determination order. We affirm.

A referee overturned employer’s denial of claimant’s aggravation claim and remanded the claim to employer for “acceptance, processing and payment of benefits under Oregon Workers’ Compensation Law.” Employer did not appeal the referee’s order, but issued a letter acknowledging that the claim was reopened and denying time loss benefits on the ground that claimant had withdrawn from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. PiwowarOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Oliver v. Norstar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. HughesOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. EUGENE EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. Eugene School Dist.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Randall v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Atchley v. GTE Metal ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Anodizing, Inc. v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Diamond Fruit Growers v. GossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Vega v. Express ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API