Legal Opinion

Anodizing, Inc. v. Heath

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 3, 1994No. 91-14829, 91-02296; CA A79602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Employer petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant temporary disability benefits. Claimant cross-petitions the determination that his claim was properly closed. We affirm the cross-petition without discussion and write only to address the petition.

Claimant’s claim for lumbar strain was closed by determination order on January 3,1991. Claimant requested reconsideration of the determination order, arguing that the claim was prematurely closed. The Department of Insurance and Finance (DIF) 1 issued its order on reconsideration on May 17,1991, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lebanon Plywood v. SeiberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Roseburg Forest Products v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atchley v. GTE Metal ErectorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. Santos v. Caryall TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Foster Wheeler Constructors, Inc. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  4. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. CotnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. Vega v. Express ServicesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API