Chicago Steel Rule & Die Fabricators Co. v. ADT Security Systems, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Hara Frossard
Plaintiffs Chicago Steel Rule & Die Fabricators Co. (Chicago Steel) and Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois (Travelers), as subrogee of Chicago Steel, brought this action against defendants ADT Security Systems, Inc., its successor corporation ADT Security Services, Inc. (ADT), and Tyco International, Ltd. (Tyco), to recover damages resulting from a fire that occurred at a plant operated by Chicago Steel. This case presents an issue of first impression as to whether an exculpatory clause in a contract between two commercial parties can preclude one of the commercial parties from bringing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Kedzie and 103rd Currency Exchange, Inc. v. HodgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
- Sommer v. Federal Signal Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Nelson v. Union Wire Rope Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1964
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Deminsky v. Arlington Plastics MacHineryWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Evans v. Lima Lima Flight Team, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Spears v. The Association of Illinois Electric CooperativesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
- Metz v. Department of Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- CHARLES RANDOLPH HARRELL v. BMS PARTNERS, LLC d/b/a BROWARD MOTORSPORTSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.