Legal Opinion · Dissent

Council v. . Pridgen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 17, 1910PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1DissentClark, C. J.

Ejectment. It was admitted that the property in controversy had belonged to Mrs. Sarah E. Wooten, wife of Shade Wooten, Esq., and that in June, 1893, she made a deed, purporting to convey the property. This deed, executed by herself alone was witnessed by E. W. Wooten, Jr., and was proved by the oath and examination of said witness and registered on such probate and that no privy examination of said Sarah E. Wooten was had. The name of Shade Wooten, the husband, did not appear in the body of the deed, nor did he, in any way, join therein, except that his written consent thereto, signed by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. . KinslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Hanover National Bank v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Hall v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Ball v. Paquin.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Wachovia National Bank v. IrelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. Buford v. . MochySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Buford v. MochySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API