Legal Opinion · Dissent

Buford v. . Mochy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1944PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1DissentBarnhill, J.

DEVIN and SEAWELL, JJ., concur in dissent. Civil action in ejectment.

The plaintiffs, who had been married to each other, were divorced in 1936. Thereafter the feme plaintiff held herself out and did business as a single woman. On or about 1 September, 1940, she authorized her attorney, Thomas J. Moore, to sell her house and lot in the town of Wilson. Pursuant to this authorization, Moore forthwith negotiated a contract with the defendants for the purchase of the property. They were told that the feme plaintiff was unmarried, and at the time the deed was drafted, which was prior to its…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Loughran v. LoughranSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Drury v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
  4. Johnson v. BryanTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  2. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Cruthis v. SteeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Harris v. SteeleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API