Legal Opinion

Grodi v. Mierow

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1928No. Docket No. 76, Calendar No. 33,651PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFead, C. J.

This is review of a judgment for plaintiff in an action for damages arising out of a collision of automobiles. The only question is whether plaintiff was guilty of negligence as 'a matter of law. The testimony and inferences most favorable to plaintiff must be accepted. The collision occurred April 20,1924, in daylight, on an open country road intersection where each driver could see the other 1,000 feet or more from the crossing. Defendant Russell Mierow approached from the west on the Sixteen mile road, which is 24 feet wide from bank to bank, at a rate of speed somewhere between 18 and 50…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. OrmistonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Geeck v. LuckenbillMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Harris v. BernsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Brown v. MittsMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kerr v. HayesMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Block v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Weller v. ManchaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Buehler v. BeadiaMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Francis v. RumseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API