Legal Opinion

Department of Taxation v. Siegman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1964PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The sole issue to be determined on this appeal is: Does a transfer by a husband to a wife of full title in two appreciated parcels of real estate held in joint tenancy during the marriage, such transfer being made pursuant to a court-imposed divorce judgment making final division of the marriage estate under the terms of sec. 247.26, Stats., create income taxable to the husband pursuant to the provisions of sec. 71.02 (1) (g), Stats, f

The department’s rationale for the additional assessment of tax against Siegman is basically this:

Sec. 71.03 (1) (g), Stats., defines as a taxable receipt,

“All…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Helvering v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wright v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Wetzel v. WetzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. BenoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Krueger v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. City of Milwaukee v. Universal Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API