Legal Opinion

City Lumber Co. v. Barnhill

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

FROM MADISON. Appeal from Chancery Court of Madison County. J. W. Boss, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

This case is before the court on a petition to rebe&r. Petitioner, City Lumber Company, urges that the real estate of Mrs. Barnhill, a feme covert, should be Subjected to liability as her separate estate under the doctrine of the case of Shacklett v. Polk, 4 Heisk. 104, 113, to the effect that the separate estate of a married woman may be held liable for debts created for its benefit and preservation, with or without an express undertaking on her part to bind it. It is sufficient to reply to this contention that the- City Lumber Company, as complainant, did not proceed on an allegation that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shacklett v. PolkTennessee Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City Lumber Co. v. TempleTennessee Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API