City Lumber Co. v. Temple
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM MADISON. Appeal from the Chancery Conrt of Madison County. — E. L. Bullock, Special Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lansden
delivered the .opinion of the Court.
The original and amended bills filed by the complainant show that the complainant furnished to D. C. Smith, a contractor with the defendant’s husband, certain lumber which was used in the erection of two buildings on the real estate of the defendant who was then a married- woman. The defendant at the date the lumber was furnished was the owner by duly registered deed of the lots upon which the two houses were erected. The complainant charges that *90it had' no actual knowledge at the time the lumber was furnished that the land was owned by defendant, but…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cole Manufacturing Co. v. FallsTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. RunnelsTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
- Memphis Street Railway Co. v. ShawTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Ransome v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- City Lumber Co. v. BarnhillTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- State ex rel. Williams v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1918