Legal Opinion

Thomas Ray Latham v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)

Decided January 5, 2006No. 02-04-00230-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-04-230-CR

THOMAS RAY LATHAM APPELLANT

V

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 30TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

------------

I. Introduction

A jury found Appellant Thomas Ray Latham guilty of indecency with a child and assessed his punishment at twenty years= confinement and a $10,000 fine. Latham=s appellate counsel has filed an Anders brief asserting that there are no grounds that could be argued successfully on appeal. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967). We grant counsel=s…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Cain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Zuniga v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API