United States v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Defendant Dexter Anderson appeals from the district court’s denial of his petition for a reduced sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on the Sentencing Commission’s retroactive amendment of crack cocaine Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm because the district court correctly found that it was not legally authorized to reduce Anderson’s sentence.
In 2004, defendant Anderson was found guilty by a jury of several crack cocaine and firearm charges. Under the Sentencing Guidelines then in effect, his offense level was 44 and his criminal history was *130III. The Guidelines called for a life…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. MelvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Dexter Anderson, A/K/A Dek, and Valencia Y. ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. StephensonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. TaylorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013