Legal Opinion

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 15, 2013No. Criminal No. 2006-0171PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

Before the Court is defendant Carl Michael Taylor’s Motion [56] to Reduce Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §. 3582(c)(2). Upon consideration of defendant’s Motion [56] to Reduce Sentence, defendant’s Supplement to Defendant’s Motion [57], the government’s Opposition [61], defendant’s Reply [69], the entire record herein, the applicable law, and for the reasons set forth below, defendant’s Motion to Reduce Sentence will be DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

In 2007, pursuant to a written plea agreement, defendant pled guilty to Conspiracy to Distribute and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Dillon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Freeman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Washington Legal Foundation v. United States Sentencing CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Jose LopezCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McGarity v. Sun-Maid Growers of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API