Legal Opinion

E.S.M. Group, Inc. v. Penrod (In Re Penrod)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida.

Decided May 27, 1983No. 19-12866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

SIDNEY M. WEAVER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This Cause having come before the Court upon a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, and the Court having heard the arguments of counsel and being fully advised in the premises finds that pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 522(b)(2)(B) a debtor using state exemptions may exempt:

any interest in property in which the debtor had, immediately before the commencement of the case, an interest as a tenant by the entirety or joint tenant to the extent that such interest as a tenant by the entirety or joint tenant is exempt…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ohio Butterine Co. v. HargraveSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Hadley v. Koehler (In Re Koehler)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1980
  3. In Re LungerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1981
  4. STATE DEPT. OF COM., DIV. OF EMP. SECURITY v. LoweryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  5. Hart v. AtwoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1928

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pepenella v. Life Insurance Co. of Georgia (In Re Pepenella)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  2. In Re KimmelUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1991
  3. In Re DroumtsekasUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API