Hart v. Atwood

In this case the appellant has grouped in his brief three assignments of error, as follows:

“2. That the Court erred in finding that complainant is entitled to an equitable lien on the property described in the bill of complaint.

‘ ‘ 3. That the Court erred in finding that the equities of this cause are with the complainant.

“4. That the Court erred in rendering its final decree of August 5, 1927.

The assignment of error numbered 3 is without merit and, therefore, all assignments of error fail.

In Smithie v. State, 88 Fla. 70, it is held:

“Where assignments of error are grouped in the brief of…