Legal Opinion

Ridgway v. Vaughan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1932No. 29,055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.

The action was brought in the conciliation court of Minneapolis. G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 1377, et seq. The statement of claim was informal but amounted to this: That the plaintiff was entitled to a chair which she had bailed to the defendant for the purpose of having it repaired. The defendant admitted that he had possession of the chair and claimed that he was entitled to five dollars for repairs. The conciliation court found for the defendant.

The plaintiff then demanded a removal to the municipal court of Minneapolis pursuant to the provisions of the statute. In the municipal court the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Halsey v. SvitakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stolp v. ScrimshawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Appeal of O'RourkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  3. Warner v. A. G. Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API