Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. City of St. Paul

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1896No. Nos. 9933-(203)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., overruling a demurrer to tbe answer.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

Tbe plaintiff is tbe bolder of two certificates issued on tbe tax sale of July 18, 1888, by tbe city treasurer of St. Paul, wbicb ¡sale was made to enforce payment of taxes assessed for local improvements, under certain provisions of tbe charter of tbe city of St. Paul. Notice of tbe time of expiration of redemption was given in tbe same manner as in tbe case of Bergen v. Anderson, 62 Minn. 232, 64 N. W. 561. Therefore, as wé held in that case, tbe notice was void. Notwithstanding that, tbe city officers, after tbe end of tbe five-years redemption period, issued deeds to plaintiff for tbe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bergen v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merchants' Realty Co. v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. Germania Bank v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Burnside v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API