Burnside v. Moore
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied real estate. The answer alleged that defendant was the owner in fee of all the lands described in the complaint and that plaintiff had no interest therein, except a possible lien for taxes.
Read the full summary
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to determine adverse claims to vacant and unoccupied real estate. The answer alleged that defendant was the owner in fee of all the lands described in the complaint and that plaintiff had no interest therein, except a possible lien for taxes. The case was tried before Ensign, J., who made findings and ordered judgment in favor of defendant quieting-title to each parcel of land described, free from any lien or interest therein on the part of plaintiff, and enjoining plaintiff from prosecuting any claim of lien for taxes or otherwise against the…
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, O.
This is an action to determine adverse claims to three separate parcels of real estate. Plaintiff claims under tax titles; defendant under the original or patent title. Judgment was rendered in favor of defendant and plaintiff appealed therefrom. The three tracts of land in controversy were bid in for the state at the tax sale held on May 2, 1892, for the taxes of 1890. No redemption was made and the lands became forfeited to the state. Two of the tracts were sold to plaintiff on December 28, 1905, under the law providing for the sale of such forfeited lands. In connection with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hoyt v. ChapinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Downing v. LucySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Lawton v. BarkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Stein v. HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Berglund v. GravesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.