Legal Opinion
Jackson v. I.C. System, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided November 30, 2020No. 4:19-cv-01702Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TONNETTE JACKSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) vs. ) Case No. 4:19-cv-01702-SEP ) I.C. SYSTEM, INC., ) ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Before the Court are several motions concerning the scope and necessity of discovery. Plaintiff Tonnette Jackson filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Doc. [16]. Defendant I.C. System, Inc. responded with a Motion for Discovery under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d) (“Rule 56(d) Motion”). Doc. [23]. Defendant then moved to compel discovery. Doc. [27]. As the discovery deadline…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Shelton v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Jan Vallejo v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Wingate v. Gage County School Dist., No. 34Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.